This interview was conducted at Pip's home near Paris on the occasion of the reissue of Delivery's "Fools Meeting" album in April 1999.
Have you heard the Delivery album recently
?
I haven't, no. I heard it about ten years ago. What I remember of it
is in fact more what Phil says about it, that it's a good record of
Steve's playing. It's the last blues record that Steve ever made.
That was already beginning to fall apart, it had been a quite
straight rhythm'n'blues, if not fairly purist blues band, for quite a
while, and Steve was a very accomplished boogie-woogie piano player.
When the group was based around him, nothing was ever recorded. I
think he plays really good on that. Also Lol, as far as I remember,
he does some nice stuff on that, Lol Coxhill. And Roy Babbington...
But I'd actually had an accident, I'd got a bit of metal in my tendon
and all that, so I'd had to learn how to hold the stick this way
rather than that way... So I wasn't very comfortable drummingwise.
And Phil, he sort of cringes with embarrassment about his playing on
it. But hey, we were really young... I'd be quite interested in
hearing it again, though!
Was it in any way the starting point of what
you did later on?
I suppose there was some kind of inklings... It gives some idea of
what we'd do. But I really don't think Phil was really serious about
composing. He was more serious about learning to play guitar at the
time. So he came up with a few things more based on riffs and modal
things, rather than the kind of stuff he does now. I don't think Phil
really got his kind of composing chops, really, until the end of
National Health in a way, and the beginning of In Cahoots, then he
really started getting into it. Although of course he wrote some good
stuff before that, "Nan True's Hole" for instance was a really good
riff, but I don't think he really got seriously into this mad harmony
stuff that he does now, that sort of effort - or rather lack of
effort, cause it comes pouring out of him! But I think that's what
his work's been like more in the last twenty years, should we
say.
Would you say Delivery had an original style or
was it just another blues band in the British blues-boom of the
Sixties?
Oh, completely, yeah. I think we wanted to be a group just like all
the rest of the blues-boom, that's what came first. And then when we
started taking lots of drugs, and listening more to Coltrane and jazz
things... And we began to wonder, why were we, white middle-class
musicians, trying to do that anyway? But we actually did a lot of
interesting tours with American blues artists, and when I think about
it, it's fantastic. We worked a lot for a while, backing people like
Lowell Fulson, BB King, Eddie Boyd, Jack Dupree and all that, great
musicians. Cause we were kind of cheap backing group, and I had a
van. I remember Otis Spann, who was Muddy Waters' piano player, we
did a tour with him, and I can still remember the look of shock on
his face when I rolled up to pick him up at his hotel in my green
Weaver van... This was what he was going to be driving in for the
next three weeks! (laughs) We were paid about five quid a day for
the gigs, including the van.
Was there a musical environment in the late 60s
that encouraged you to look for a more original approach
?
Mostly, it was getting very stoned and listening to music, and
nothing else, for about a year, so apart from getting really smashed
and listening to music all the time... We'd always done that a lot,
but I suppose... meeting people like Roy Babbington, Robert Wyatt,
Lol Coxhill, automatically forced us into different things. Even Lol
played in soul bands like The Gass and things like that, but I
mean... Don't forget that in the late 60s there was a huge improvised
jazz scene in England. It was almost more forceful than it was in
America, and certainly more so than over here [France]. If you listen
to some of those records now like... I was in New York last year, I
found that record called "Things We Like" by Jack Bruce, and there's
like, Dick Heckstall-Smith, McLaughlin and Jon Hiseman on that
record. And I mean, I don't even think of Jon Hiseman as a drummer
now, but he plays fucking great on it. I'll tell you - it sounds
quite like what Robert was playing with Soft Machine. It's very busy,
really tense, exciting drumming. It's pretty free, I mean, you
couldn't put out records like that anymore, people don't. But that
school kind of still exists, but it's completely shunned. Anyway, we
were running into some of that, as well.
Did you listen to the early jazz-rock stuff,
like "In A Silent Way"...?
That was a bit later. I thought the first Mahavishnu record was great
too. "In A Silent Way", certainly, yeah. But at that point we were
already doing something more like jazz-rock, even way before that, or
round about that time, I suppose, yeah. After the second Mahavishnu
record I thought it started to get very dull, though, and similarly,
so did Chick Corea, and so did Soft Machine, and so did Lifetime. So
did all those bands that looked like, you know, it can only get
bigger and bigger... And it didn't, unfortunately not, no. And I
wonder whether Hendrix would have just carried on getting more and
more extroardinary... Probably. So I don't know, it's just a sort of
completely natural thing. I suppose when we eventually got Hatfield
together in the end, Dave Stewart put more the brakes on the kind of
improvised sort of thing, and pulled it more into structured things;
and Richard was much more into a song sort of thing. Otherwise I
think Phil and I would have got much more extreme, much more of a
marginal thing than it was.
(c) 1999 Calyx - The Canterbury Website