::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::
::
::
- WHAT'S RATTLIN' ?
-
::
:: The Weekly
Digest for Canterbury Music
Addicts ::
::
Issue #
111
::
::
Sunday, November 22nd,
1998
::
::
::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Canterbury Musicians Server
<mail@musart.co.uk>
Subject: Digital Bootleggers
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 23:24:54 +0000
Hello Aymeric and Friends,
This follow-up message from ELTON DEAN is for inclusion in
the next Canterbury Music Newsletter please.
The following fax was received from Elton on 12 November
----BEGIN-------
Re: Aymeric's letter [see below - A.L.]
I'm not angry at genuine fans of the music - of course I'm
not - but I can see the possibility of an escalation of the
situation to the point where copyright can be abused and I'm
making my point before it does.
As regards the Ogun material - lobby Ogun for CD release -
Hazel Miller needs to be reminded of these things. In the meantime
I have pristine vinyl for Ely Rabin if he cares to get in touch
with me :-
Happy Daze
Oh for the Edge
Welcomet
Bologna Tapes
Yours Elton
c/o EDTAPES
7 Farleigh Rd
Stoke Newington
LONDON N16
U.K.
----END---------
[The following is what I had written (on 29 Oct 1998) to
Mark following his message in WR - A.L.]
>Dear Mark,
>
>To be honest, I don't completely agree with you or
Elton in the case in
>point, but maybe you will be able to give me your
detailed opinion.
>
>The guy in question was talking of records by or
involving Elton that are
>presently unavailable in any form - they have not been
reissued on CD, and
>vinyl versions are only available at prohibitive
prices when you're lucky
>enough to come upon a copy in a second hand shop.
>
>When there is no alternative, what should a fan of
Elton do - wait for
>years until it's finally out on CD, officially ? I for
one think that when
>a proper reissue appears, with cleaned-up sound and
possibly bonus tracks,
>these guys will buy it AGAIN. Or I think it's safe to
assume so.
>
>CD-Rs made from vinyl records are just an updated
version of private tapes.
>I admit to having several of Elton's albums on tape
made from vinyl source.
>Because I wanted to know these recordings - I wouldn't
have heard them yet
>if I had waited for a reissue to appear.
>
>Now of course there's a possibility that some guys
will try to SELL CDs
>made from vinyl or, even worse, sell bootleg CD-Rs
made from official CDs.
>That, of course, must be stopped.
>
>But when it only concerns a guy exchanging tapes or
CD-Rs of stuff
>unavailable commercially, I don't think you or Elton
should get that angry,
>unless of course you're aware of things that I'm not
aware of.
>
>The same thing could be said of Pip Pyle's "Equip'Out"
album - should it
>become available on CD in the future, there are many
of us who will be
>happy to discard their hissy and scratchy tape
recordings in favour of the
>digital version.
>
>Let me know what you think.
>
>Best regards,
>Aymeric
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: AMathes737@aol.com
Subject: Steve Feigenbaum's response to my open letter
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 20:40:34 EST
As you might suspect I was well aware (before I wrote my
letter) of many of
the points Steve made in his response. I am fully aware of
the lack of
possibility that Hatfield will ever record again. I
know Dave Stewart wants
to revamp pop songs, not play jazz. I know these guys
don't always get along.
I know Stewart did Pip's song to offer support. Yeah, I
know all that.
I was using this argument as an attention-getter to make a
larger point which
is actually supported by Steve's recounting of his record
sales. We, the
Canterbury record buying public, are most interested in
buying two kinds of
Canterbury product:
1) out of print, seminal work from the main originators of
"Canterbury" music e.g. Elton Dean's JUST US, Alan Gowen's BEFORE
A WORD IS SAID, Live Soft Machine- Is that a surprise to anyone
(ever try to buy JUST US on LP - impossible)? What you have
here, as you well know Steve, is pent up demand. And God Bless YOU
for filling that demand and giving us even more with the extra
tracks and fresh liner notes and attention to detail. Of all the
re-issuers you are the most moral! Without a doubt! What
most buyers would agree upon is that we don't need barely
listenable recordings of teenaged main originators of Canterbury
music doing covers of James Brown songs or whatever. Or, what the
hell is "Garden of Love" with Kevin Ayers and Robert Wyatt. Why
aren't you guys talking THAT one up? Could it be unlistenable
dross? Perhaps, if not, please inform because I didn't buy
that one. But Steve is right when he says I bought another
VOICEPRINT doozy OUT by Anthony Moore. He knows this because I
bought it from HIM along with Mind in the Trees by Elton Dean,
John Greave's Bottle Of Laundry and Sophia Domancich's new CD,
(Thanks Dave Stewart for NOT playing on the Hatfield reunion or I
would never have heard this wonderful JAZZ pianist - she made that
reunion New and Stimulating for me. So Steve, if you're going to
breach Customer-Vendor privilege you might just as well have given
them the whole order! It shows that I DO buy new material by these
artists. Which brings me to my next catagory of what Canterbury
buyers want, and incidentally why I
bought Anthony Moore's UP from you. I so enjoyed the NEW
Slapp Happy CA VA ,
especially A. Moore's material that I was curious about
some of his earlier work. You see, good new recordings stimulate
sales of old (and bad, in this case) recordings of the same
artist. Eureka!
2) Substantial new music from the main originators of
Canterbury. e.g.-Shleep by Wyatt, RSVP and Caravan of Dreams by
Richard Sinclair, the new Phil Miller. If Dean and Hopper don't
sell as well it's probably because they over-record and record
buyers perceive some their CD's as lacking in quality. Am I right?
Maybe not. But I've been listening to this music as long as Steve
has and I will always want the original Hatfield over the
derivative Muffins (one of Steve's groups). I'll take Seven Year
Itch over the Wilde Flowers recorded in a subway tunnel on their
way to a sweet sixteen party. You want to spend your money on
that, be my guest. I'll wait for Richard Sinclair to scrape up
some backing for a new effort. It might take a while if all of you
keep supporting some of these awful reissues. Real fans know which
ones are awful and which labels put them out just for easy money
over investing in new music. So, yes Steven, you're right. I know
it's a business. But none of you are the next Richard Branson are
you? But, wait a minute, didn't he start with Oldfield, Gong,
Hatfield, Henry Cow and Kevin Coyne? Seems to have worked
out for him. Strange world.
Allen Mathes
[A couple of days later, Allen sent the following addendum
to his message:]
Two afterthoughts concerning my response to Steve's
letter.
1. I didn't mean to (seriously) imply that Steve was
breaching any confidence by saying I bought certain items from his
excellent mailorder service, all of this is in good fun, and I've
been a loyal customer of Wayside for over 15 years! (God, is it
that long, Steve?) and will continue to be. Truth to be told,
Steve has done alot to keep this music on the map even when
there was no internet and all of us thought we were the only
ones out there who cared about this stuff! So, just know
that Steve and Wayside are the good guys.
2. I think that discussing why people buy certain product
is important. As the debate over taping and the stern words from
Elton Dean and Mark Hewins indicate, this is some peoples' way of
making a living. We have to respect that. And as Chris
Cutler is indicating, we true fans want to help, not hurt, the
musicians. We should support them in ways that will help
them. And, the point of my light-hearted treatment of a serious
subject with Steve is that we should support new work by these
artists and be more suspicious of re-issues that seem to
exploit the past rather than encourage future creative
projects. Fair enough? Having said all that there is nothing more
satisfying to a fan than seeing this music continue to thrive, not
just as an ARTIFACT but as a living ART. So go buy all of
Steve's noble new releases. You could do alot worse (as I hope
I've demonstrated).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Roger Farbey <mmr@easynet.co.uk>
Subject: Reissues
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 13:09:31 +0000
Dear Aymeric
Re: Steve Feigenbaum's posting and your comments about
re-issues (WR # 110). I think the reason re-issues become so
popular is that record companies so quickly delete albums of a
'specialist' nature ie, non-mainstream. Jazz and prog-rock are
definite victims of this enthusiastic culling policy. This
therefore fuels a massive demand by collectors and enthusiasts for
these deleted items. Unless the fans actually die waiting in the
interim period period between the original release and the
eventual re-release, they will then all presumably buy these
albums either again (because their vinyl copies are scratched to
bits) or because they never had the opportunity to buy it in the
first place. This backlog, I imagine, creates an initial but heavy
demand once the re-release takes place.
My comments are these.
I don't believe that the relatively higher level of
re-issue sales is such a bad thing because it must surely generate
continued interest in the artist and his contemporary work, if
only for purposes of comparison.
If record companies didn't delete things so quickly there
would not be such a re-issue sales bias.
Speaking as a consumer, I believe that re-issues do not
discourage people buying contemporary recordings by artists in
addition to their re-released material.
As a case in point which may be interest to WR readers,
trumpeter/composer Ian Carr has just (two weeks ago) had a double
CD issued of two of his most recent albums, 'Out of the Long Dark'
(with Nucleus) and 'Old Heartland' (with former Nucleus and Soft
Machine drummer John Marshall). This excellent pairing of very
fine music is available on the BGO label. A relevant point to note
is that in the (new) sleevenotes, it mentions that 'Old
Heartland' was deleted almost as soon as it was originally
released, which would explain why most Ian Carr/Nucleus fans will
either never have heard it before or just never heard of it. Just
because a CD is re-released (and I for one can't wait to purchase
Elton Dean's 'Just Us' re-release in the UK - we're still waiting
here!) doesn't mean it isn't new to many listeners now. Surely,
the artists will still benefit from royalties from the re-issues.
But I do take your point about contemporary stuff and,
unlike Steve, have managed to purchase Pip Pyle's 7 year itch
which has got to be a must for all serious Canterbury fans.
Cheers
Roger Farbey
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "philT" <pturnbul@bigpond.com>
Subject: Henry Cow Make Money (shock, horror, probe)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 14:59:22 +1100
[In WR#110, Aymeric Leroy wrote:]
>I'm sure they all know it would be much easier and
>financially rewarding to reform Hatfield or Henry
Cow...
Lord have mercy upon my soul - would a reformed Henry Cow
actually make any money? I know that I'd go to see them (if they
came to the great southern land) and, I imagine, that there would
be quite a few takers in Europe and the US. But a few gigs do not
a million make.
And a reformation is such a limiting idea as well,
especially when they all seem to be in such fine form - Fred
Frith's "Pacifica" is easily the best thing he's ever written (and
finer, in many ways, than any Cow piece); John Greaves' "Songs" is
absolutely gorgeous late night music; Tim Hodgkinson's "Pragma" is
plinky-plonk music at it's best (and so on and so on...)
(On the other hand, Slapp Happy's "Ca Va" is mighty cute
as well)
philT
[I didn't say Hatfield or Henry Cow reformations would
make them millionaires, but I'm sure they could expect to sell
much more records and sell out reasonably big venues, just because
of the "cult" status of these bands. I think that's a fact - A.L.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Age Rotshuizen <age@cable.a2000.nl>
Subject: old vs. new
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 11:12:27 +0100
Hello Rattlers,
The previous issue had quite an interesting discussion
about the re-release of old material and the release of new stuff
by our favourite musicians. I hadn't realized that the (Cuneiform)
reissues would sell so much more than the new CDs, simply 'cause I
buy them both. IMO there isn't much difference between an old
Hopper solo-album and a new Hugh record. They're both equally
good, great or briljant, depending on my mood.
Although albums like Virtually and Just Us are among my
favourites, I'd like to give a thumbs up for some of the 90s stuff
like:
* Hugh Hopper Band - Carousel
* Hugh Hopper - Hooligan Romantics
* Hopper/Hewins - Adreamor
* In Cahoots - Parallel
* Pip Pyle - Seven Year Itch
* Elton Dean's Newsense
* Robert Wyatt - Shleep
As much as I'd like to see more Hatfield material be
released, I feel the same about a new Phil Miller record, because
it's all high quality to my ears. An example of releasing too much
is (IMHO again) the Canterburied Sounds CDs. Most of this material
is unlistenable (on the first two volumes there are about 5-6
tracks I can listen too without skipping halfway through). And -
of course - it's all "interesting" and "legendary" and I am not
opposed to these releases (hey, I buy 'm right?), but I'd much
rather get my hands on a CD with new recordings by Hopper, Miller,
Wyatt or Dean.
Another thing: why is so much unreleased material
surfacing on CD, while a lot of vinyl has never been re-issued
yet? OK, I know the deal: there's this record.com that doesn't
want to sell rights and stuff, they want to release it theirselves
(and they will in 2020). If the guys at Voiceprint can release 4
volumes of Canterbury dust within two months, why can't they
re-issue both Coxhill/Miller albums, some ED 70s stuff (they would
make Milos happy, that's for sure!), Nucleus, third Isotope, ....
[fill in your favourite],
Age
[Coincidentally, while putting this issue together, I'm
listening to Isotope's "Deep End" on CD... So it exists! It was
reissued by Line Records, but I guess it's now deleted. The first
two were also reissued on the same label, but have since been
reissued as a 2-on-1 by See For Miles. Regarding Elton Dean's 70s
stuff, you may follow his suggestion earlier in this issue! -
A.L.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: NYLifer@aol.com
Subject: money trees
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 03:17:24 EST
[In WR#110, Chris Cutler wrote:]
>concerning the Robert Wyatt video 'Little Red Robin
Hood' (a musical SNIP
>launch in Turin (Robert was there and introduced it)
and afterwards
>arranged a special English (no subtitles) version for
anyone interested.
>It's available direct from ReR Megacorp for £14. Email
credit card order to
How much US?
>megacorp@dial.pipex.com or by regular mail to 79
Beulah Rd. Thornton Heath,
>Surrey CR7 8JG. UK But please note - it's only in PAL
format, not NTSC.
Aaaaarrrrgh. Guess I'll have to wait.
>By the way, the copyrights question raised rather
forcefully (but
>understandably) by Elton D. [...]
>We don't have to play by business rules (we screw you
you try to screw us)
>- it could be done more honestly ? Anybody got any
comments or suggestions -
>just to keep the question on the surface.
Absolutely, if musicians are willing to make available HQ
audio and/or video
available in a no-frills package direct to the end
consumer, everybody benefits.
This year someone on this list did this for a Richard
Sinclair performance video. Asking for a check, made out to
Richard in return for copies.
So many folks are burning CDs these days at a cost of $1
per disk, I'm sure many here would participate in an organized pay
per CD scheme.
Witness Robert Fripp's Collectors Club releases of ancient
archived material. Give the people what they want. Couurse it's
easy to say. I imagine Fripps level of sales to be higher than we
could anticipate here. In fact, Fripp said he needed 1,000
subscribers each in both US and Europe to make the club work.
Folks sent in ~$90 for the promise od 6 CDs of old material, at
the folks choice.
Good notion, we can start the Canterbury Collectors Club.
Robert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael Rae <raejonnymac@yahoo.com>
Subject: Anthony Moore's "OUT" album
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 06:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Hello Aymeric,
Just wanted to comment a bit in response to the re-issue
of 'OUT' by Anthony Moore...I just purchased this album about a
week ago, and while it may sound a tad bit 'dated' nowadays, I
think that it was a valid re-issue, especially for completists who
may have been searching in vain for the original! And it is a bit
of a Canterburian-like "curio" with involvement from Kevin Ayers,
Andy Summers, Amanda Parsons, David Bedford, and Lol Coxhill's
children no less! It's also an early document of the long-standing
partnership that Moore and Peter Blegvad still enjoy from time to
time. I'm uncertain of this, but was "OUT" a solo release that
preceded the formation of SLAPP HAPPY? Also of note is the
Production of Peter Jenner; during 1st listen I was struck by how
much the production reminded me of the early Kevin Ayers records,
'tho that shouldn't be much of a surprise when you add up all the
participants.
As an afterthought I'd just like to say that "Ca Va" has
to be my favourite purchase of the year! SLAPP HAPPY has to be one
of the most unheard-of and underappreciated 'pop' music outfits to
grace the music charts nowadays...I understand that 'Ca Va' has
already hit 'out-of-print' status...WOW!!!
In conclusion, it's my opinion that "OUT" really did hafta
come out, if only for the odd bunch of historical completists...
it's not a BAD album, but please don't compare it to "Ca Va" ;
think more along the lines of those early Peter Jenner productions
of Kevin Ayers work... the production ambience is certainly
similar.
Keep up the EGGcellent work Aymeric!
Mike Rae
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Julian Christou <christou@as.arizona.edu>
Subject: A Few Comments
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 20:25:27 -0700
Dear Rattlers
Well, I'm finally back and getting settled in and catching
up with e-mail etc so to those I owe e-mails to "hi" and you'll be
hearing from me soon.
It seems that during my European Sojourn that Elton Dean's
"Just Us" was released by Steve F. at Cuneiform/Wayside (Thanks
Steve). As the only person I know who has a copy of the vinyl, I
was glad to see the CD release. It sounds great. I think that this
and Softs "5" make a great double package being released very
close to one another originally and I'm sorry I missed the seeing
the Softs with this line up when they played at the South Bank I
think with Just Us and Matching Mole early in '72 or late '71 I
think. I remember seeing the ads. Unfortunately I believe I
was studying for my A-levels at the time.
For the Softs fans who are not aware of Elton's solo
recordings, this is the first and starts off with the blistering
Ooglenovastrome (a great title and a great track). The
original album (engineered by Eddie Offord more famous for his
production with Yes and ELP) ends with Part The Last featuring
Elton at thge Fender Rhodes (compare Drop from 5 and the Live In
France CDs). Two tracks, Neo Caliban Grides and Blind Badger
were played by the Softs and show up on the BBC CDs. Here they get
a diiferent workout and Mike Ratledge and Roy Babbington guest.
Also the drums are by Phil Howard who replaced Robert Wyatt in the
Softs
(side 1 of 5). This CD is highly recommended for
fans of 5 era Softs and shows Elton's links to free Jazz as
well. Definitely a must album. And thanks to Steve, we also
have live bonus tracks, one courtesy of Radio Bremen (remember
Virtually) which begs the question of what else exists in the
Radio Bremen vaults? Anyone know?
With the release of the "Elton Dean" album on CD (retitled
"Just Us") the unreleased CD's of note are the two Ogus
"Ninesense" albums. So does anyone have any idea when Ogun will
start adding to their CD releases?
Anyway enough rambling and rattling.
Julian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: TALandon@aol.com
Subject: For WR
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 17:27:08 EST
Dear Aymeric and all,
A quick word to thank everyone for their (public and
private) feedback on my "Canterbury selection". I'd like to remind
everyone that the albums I proposed were in strict accordance with
Aymeric's original request: a 3-album selection to introduce
people to Canterbury music and give a broad idea of it. They
weren't necessarily my favourites, which tend to change every week
- currently: Parallel by In Cahoots, Digging In by Phil Miller
and... well, OK, I admit, Rotters' Club by Hatfield and the
North.... or Softs 2.... or Angel's Egg by Gong... or the National
Health tribute to Alan Gowan... or....).
Which brings me to a major subject in recent Rattlings:
are 'our heroes' merely museum pieces or living people as well?
OK, I'm summarizing in a violently partisan way, but I must agree
with the 'modernists'. During the 70s and early 80s, I was
delighted to find and buy a large number of 'Canterbury' and
related records. Some I read about in the press, others I just
stumbled across in record shops, armed with my fascination with
band line-ups and eager to explore further. And then, suddenly,
nothing - for the musicians that we appreciate, the line suddenly
went dead. OK, so I live in France, but I keep up with the British
press and EVERYBODY stopped speaking about them, with the
occasional exception of Robert Wyatt when he released a record (to
the French nation's great and, for me, undying glory, they really
love Wyatt - hell, sometimes I even manage to feel intellectually
fashionable because of it).
So I was more than delighted when I one day typed
Canterbury into my search engine and ended up here - Ta, Aymeric.
I then saw In Cahoots in Montreuil - amazing, a 'Canterbury" band
still alive and creating, with large numbers of my favourite
musicians and others (notably Fred T.) who have since joined their
ranks. And so to my main point: I agree with everyone who supports
the new music over the old. These guys have made some of the best
music we have ever heard, but the best way to help them to make
some more is to give them as much support now as we can. The more
they earn, the better the conditions for recording and composing
and the more chance we have of seeing them regularly.
Which brings me to the other recent "hot topic":
bootlegging and its cousins. I don't have any bootlegs, but maybe
only because I've never been offered any. However, my own rule of
thumb has always been that I'd rather give my money to Robert
Wyatt, Kevin Ayers, Pip Pyle, Phil Miller or even Daevid Allen
than to the taxman or the car-park attendant because of the
pleasure and discovery they have given me.
Lastly, thanks Aymeric for your answer to the rather
abusive mail 2 weeks ago (vaguely about Gong) in which you
reminded us that you produce WR free of charge and unpaid. In my
opinion, as a demonstration of thanks, we should all buy the
Forgas Band Phenomena CD - NOW!.
I've just sent off my order.
Love to all
Tom
[Thanks, Tom! - A.L.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Lokizak@aol.com
Subject: The Curse of the Old
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 01:24:46 EST
I couldn't help but be struck by - and saddened by - the
frustration evident in Steve Feigenbaum's post. I have to admit to
being part of the problem that he sees; I am buying those BBC
sessions just like everyone else. At times it seems like I have to
fight to stay interested in and find new music and then along
comes a band like Present or Finneus Gauge or I finally discover a
CD like Richard Sinclair's RSVP and I know the fight is worth it.
The late critic Ralph J. Gleason said it best in a televised piece
on Duke Ellington. Between sets, the Duke asked Gleason what he
wanted to hear in the next set. Gleason's answer was a heartfelt
"Duke, I want to hear what you want to play". I hope I can always
be listening for and to artists playing what they want to play. I
think that is the essence of Canterbury music. People like Steve
make that possible and need our thanks and support.
Dick Archbold
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Age Rotshuizen <age@cable.a2000.nl>
Subject: Need help for SM discographies
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 14:47:44 +0100
There are still gaps in my Hopper & Dean discographies
- and I need some help to fill them. Please mail me if you know
anything.
Elton Dean:
* Austin/Dean/Gallivan record on Ogun
* John Stevens - A Luta Continua record on Konnex
* exact rec. dates of: Dean/Wheeler/Gallivan - The Cheque
Is In The Mail
* exact rec. dates of: Elton Dean's Ninesense - Happy Daze
* any info about possible Bluesology recordings
* EDTapes (Duos, Trios, EDQ Live)
* rec. dates & location of Three's Company, Two's A
Crowd
* rec. dates of Julie Driscoll - 1969
* Heads Hands & Feet - Heads Hands & Feet
* Mike Hugg - Somewhere & Mike Hugg - Stress &
Strain
* Intercontinental Express - London
* Reg King - Reg King
* Alexis Korner - Alexis Korner & Alexis Korner - Mr.
Blues
* rec. dates of Keith Tippett Group - You Are Here.... I
Am There
* Keith Tippett - A Loose Kite in a Gentle Wind / Floating
with...
* rec. dates of Julie Tippetts - Sunset Glow
Hugh Hopper:
tracklisting of these radio sessions:
* 16/11/1971, Soft Machine, Sound of the Seventies
* 11/7/1972, Soft Machine, Peel Session
* 17/10/1972, Soft Machine, Sound of the Seventies
* 29/12/1972, Soft Machine, TV Full House
* 16/4/1974, Stomu Yamash'ta & East Wind, Radio One In
Concert
* 9/1/1975, Isotope, Radio One In Concert
* 24/6/1975, Isotope, Peel Session
* 13/11/1975, Windo/Monkman/Hopper/Powell, TV Session,
Stanley Myers
* 27/3/1984, Dean/Ponzol/Schroeder/Hopper/Gallivan, SWF
Radio Concert, Wuppertal, Germany
* 16/11/1987, In Cahoots, Jazz Today Session
* personnel of Daevid Allen - Twelve Selves
* tracks of Anaid - Vetue de Noir & Anaid - Belladonna
* confirmation of existence of Brotherhood - Pride. It
should have been
released by Virgin in 1995
* Hugh Hopper And Odd Friends
visit:
http://people.a2000.nl/arotshui/hugh.html
http://people.a2000.nl/arotshui/elton.html
Other additions and corrections will be appreciated
Thanks,
Age
[May I take this opportunity to note that the Online
Canterbury Discography has just been redesigned and updated. A
notable upgrade is that it now includes most of the album covers.
Rattlers with scanners are advised to contact me if they can help
filling some of the gaps. And while we're at it, for recent
subscribers, your help in providing the missing information is
welcome, so please check out:
http://www.alpes-net.fr/~bigbang/cantdisco.html Also new online is
a profile/interview of Steve Cook (Gilgamesh/Soft Machine) - A.L.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jerome Schmidt <artzero@club-internet.fr>
Subject: Japanese Independant Musics book
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:55:33 +0200
Hello all,
After hours and hours of work, lots of francs, dollars,
and yens spent, last but not least, our book about '90s Japanese
Independent Musics' is published and available by December 1st
through MUSEA production (they financed the overall project):
http://www.musearecords.com
This is the FRENCH version (the ENGLISH one will be
available in early 99).
It features more than 500 bands with complete
discographies, musical and biographical comments (from 3 lines to
a full page!), photographies, and a general introduction as well
as dozen contacts indicating where to find the stuff.
The musical field covered are: progressive rock, RIO,
canterbury, jazz, improvised musics, japanoise, electronica,
zeuhl, avant-rock, postclassical, new musics and psychedelic
musics.
INCLUDED: 2 CDs! One features 'the best of Japanese prog
rock', compiled by Musea, and the 2nd one features unreleased
tracks by famous independant artists such as: Ruins, Soh Band,
Bondage Fruit, Hoppy Kamiyama, Haco, Haino Keiji, Furudate Tetsuo,
Trembling Strain, etc...
The writing staff consisted of a collective work with
people from Big Bang magazine, Improjazz, Octopus, Peace Warriors,
Prog' Resiste, Margen, Expose, Rock Style, etc...
All in all the price (the book + 2 Cds) is at 160FF.
We do hope this project will interest you much. To order
this book (french edition only by now), email to:
museaorder@id-net.fr
or to: artzero@club-internet.fr
All the best!
Jerome
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jerome Schmidt <artzero@club-internet.fr>
Subject: Peter Blegvad album vs Slapp Happy
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:58:21 +0200
Hello Rattlers,
I'm a great fan of last Slapp Happy's album, I can't stop
listening to
it.
I received recently new Rer release by peter Belgvad which
features two
songs which were also on Slapp Cd 'Ca Va'.
I dunno what's wrong, but Dagmar Krause's voice misses
much, even if the
album of Blegvad is really one of my best pick of the year
in this
musical field.
Any advice on it?
BTW, the MNEMONIST reissue is very challenging, very
interesting to my
ears, by its proteiform diversity, though rather
experimental to some
ears maybe...
Best
Jerome
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
END OF ISSUE 111
_________________________________________________________________________
WHAT'S RATTLIN' ?
- WHAT'S RATTLIN'
? - WHAT'S
RATTLIN' ?
_________________________________________________________________________
CALYX - The Canterbury Website
http://www.alpes-net.fr/~bigbang/calyx.html
THE ULTIMATE ONLINE CANTERBURY DISCOGRAPHY
http://www.alpes-net.fr/~bigbang/cantdisco.html
WHAT'S RATTLIN' ? BACK ISSUES - ONLINE ARCHIVE
http://musart.co.uk/watrat/watrat.htm
+ search engine : http://musart.co.uk/ssearch.htm
* To subscribe, send me an e-mail with 'WR sub' in the
subject line.
* To send a message for inclusion in the next issue, send
it with 'WR: [subject]' in the subject line.
* If your e-mail address changes, please notify me and
mention both your old and new addresses so I can remove the former
and add the latter.
* If you can no longer receive WR or don't want to
anymore, don't forget to unsubscribe!
_________________________________________________________________________